DVD Review: ‘Milk’

Wow. This film is tedious.

I wondered for a moment, after watching the third or fourth of Milk’s many man-on-man make-out sessions, if I was just a wee bit prejudiced against gay men, and that explained my lack of response to the film. (It is also somewhat odd to watch a Hollywood film where a woman doesn’t appear or say a word until about an hour in. To an audience, gay or straight, which has come of age watching the camera adoringly record the eyes, hair, and teeth of a long line of screen goddesses stretching from Rita Hayworth to Angelina Jolie, the experience occasionally feels like it’s not worth the trouble. So I find myself in the odd position of being a straight guy feeling ambivalent about a gay film because it doesn’t have enough glamorous hair and makeup.)

I always find myself admiring heterosexual male stars as they simulate, very convincingly, gay lovemaking, foreplay, cuddling, and general couples-cutesiness. I imagine, if put into the shoes of Sean Penn making out with James Franco, I would laugh uncontrollably, or get pissed off that he didn’t shave that morning. Does this mean I’m prejudiced?

I don’t know, maybe. But I’m pretty sure that’s not why I didn’t like the movie.

A.O. Scott of the Times praised the film’s refusal to delve into psychological or sociological motivation to explain Harvey Milk. The movie tells us that Harvey is charismatic, and a fighter, and that’s about it. After that, it’s straight into the marching and bullhorns. But that’s not a movie. It’s not even a good documentary. You get the feeling the director (Gus Van Sant) and screenwriter may both have been a little too close to the material, which plays along to the beats of an extremely standard biopic, and simultaneously refuses to indulge in too much emotion or suspense or turns of plot—anything which might be construed as manipulative.

Cheap psychology is bad, but no psychology is worse. There was a real Harvey Milk, who by all accounts was extraordinary, but there has to be a movie Harvey Milk played by Sean Penn too, and the movie Harvey Milk is not endowed, by default, with all of the extraordinary qualities of the real one.

I will forgive Van Sant for failing to entertain. But I can’t forgive the movie for failing to provoke thought. There is a simple message of acceptance and hope at the heart of Harvey Milk’s story. But you can’t simply be told things at the movies. Whatever ideas we find in them, we have to discover ourselves. There is no way to access the material in Milk except exactly the way Van Sant wants us to–straight on, no questions asked. Egh. Nobody goes to the movies for a civics lesson.


About hubzbubz

Currently residing in Brooklyn.
This entry was posted in Movies, Reviews and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to DVD Review: ‘Milk’

  1. If I was reviewing a movie,it would be about the movie and not if I was one of the actors in a movie. Your review reminded me when Elizabeth Taylor’s movie Cleopatra was being reviewed by someone who took time to say he could see Taylor’s vaccination on her arm and her throat scar from a tracheotomy during the scene that had nothing to do with the movie on the big screen. Yes, your review tells me you are homophobic! Since I knew Harvey, and was involved in the gay rights movement in San Francisco of that era, I could point out the flaws or mistakes. As for the actors, they all were exceptionally good portraying the real life characters in the movie.However in the Movie, they showed Harvey talking to a crowd using a bullhorn in front of the Castro Theater during an Impromptu march regarding an election in Dade County Florida… that never really happened, and in the movie recreation there were signs all over the place… and there were really only a few signs. Then the movie showed that march ending in front of City Hall, when actually Harvey never spoke there, and we ended up at Union Square.I happened to be a photographer, and my image of Milk that the scene is based on, introduced him nationally 5 months before he was elected via the Associated Press that night. There were other time line and location mistakes, but the fact that the movie MILK introduced Harvey Milk to millions of people , young and old, gay and straight, here in America and around the world! I would of given the movie 3 stars OUT of 4.
    for the history of my image visit http://www.thecastro.net/street/memoriespage/pritikin/scene05.html

  2. hubzbubz says:

    Your pictures are great! I don’t think we’re too far off on the movie either–I probably woulda given it 2 1/2 stars or something like that, I usually come off sounding more caustic than I intend when I write. It was certainly a worthy topic, and well-made; I just didn’t find it stimulating or thought-provoking at all–both qualities I found in your pictures, BTW. As for being homophobic, well, I hope you’re classifying me in the ‘about as ignorant as the average American’ basket, not the Anita Bryant one. That would make me sad 😦

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s